Karl Raimund Popper: problem neopositivistik dan teori kritis falsifikasi

Huda, M. Syamsul (2007) Karl Raimund Popper: problem neopositivistik dan teori kritis falsifikasi. ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 2 (1). pp. 71-80. ISSN 1978-3183; 2356-2218

[thumbnail of M. Syamsul Huda_Karl Raimund Popper.pdf] Text
M. Syamsul Huda_Karl Raimund Popper.pdf

Download (1MB)


Karl Popper once criticizes the positivistic paradigm by means of what he calls the theory of falsification. To him, the positivistic paradigm constitutes a failure simply because it cannot distinguish between science and prude science, that is, between empirical method and non-empirical method. In the scientific knowledge, empirical science, mathematics and logic must be differentiated, something that the positivistic paradigm has failed to do. This paradigm furthermore, did not have a clear picture what logic-based science is, empirical knowledge and psychology of knowledge. It also fails to properly understand knowledge that springs from tradition, emotion, authority and so forth. All positivistic paradigms such as that of Karl Max’s Historicism, Freud’s theory of Psycho Analysis, Adler’s theory of Individual Analysis and Newton’s theory of Gravitation fall into this trap of failure.

Item Type: Article
Huda, M. Syamsul
Uncontrolled Keywords: Induction; deduction; falsification; prude science; empirical and non-empirical science
Subjects: 22 PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES > 2202 History and Philosophy of Specific Fields > 220206 History and Philosophy of Science (incl. Non-historical Philosophy of Science)
Divisions: Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat > Prodi Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam
Depositing User: Abdun Nashir
Date Deposited: 19 Oct 2021 07:08
Last Modified: 19 Oct 2021 07:08
URI: http://repository.uinsa.ac.id/id/eprint/1572

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item